Breaking Silos: How to Prepare Your Data for AI-Driven Operations

Effective AI adoption requires more than technology; it demands operational transformation through better data management, standardization and organizational alignment to achieve measurable business outcomes.
March 26, 2026
6 min read

Key Highlights

  • Fragmented and inconsistent data is a major obstacle to AI adoption in supply chains. Data often sits in solos with different formats and definitions, making integration and visibility difficult.  
  • Effective AI-driven operational intelligence begins by aggregating data from various systems into a single data warehouse, standardizing data quality and establishing strong data management practices.
  • Successful implementation requires clear data ownership, standard definitions and treating AI initiatives as operational transformation, not just IT projects.

AI this, AI that, AI will solve everything. In some cases, that's happening. But many companies have trouble getting started or making progress because they don’t have a good grip on their data.

Many leaders underestimate the work it takes to get their data ready for AI, and the struggle is even more real in supply chains. Often, data is fragmented and stored in too many locations, data points are defined differently across systems, and companies trying to adopt AI have too narrow a focus, said Mike Mullen, COO of Bear Cognition, an AI software and solutions company for asset-based carriers and third-party suppliers.  

In a constantly changing business environment with nonstop advancements in AI, the prevailing wisdom is that the companies that learn to master the tools are best positioned to pull ahead. As more organizations wade into AI adoption and then tread water, Mullen made it clear there’s a way not just to swim but to thrive in this ocean of technology that can help leaders make decisions.

We asked Mullen how leaders can better prepare their data, break down silos and set AI initiatives up for success:

How can AI-driven operational intelligence close visibility gaps and reduce disruptions?

The first level is visibility of what’s going on. You have these siloed data sets out there: a warehouse management system tracking your inventory, a transportation management system managing all your trucks and where they're going, and your ERP, where your salespeople input all their orders into your billing. A lot of times, these are all separate.

If you can get all that data flowing into one spot, what’s the visibility? For example, if I’m putting out an ad to help sales reduce the cost of something to increase sales, how’s that going to impact my inventory inside the warehouse? Do I need to be prepared for it, which will then impact all the truckers I’ll need on the TMS side?

Getting all that data into one place and offering good visibility dashboards to the different teams is step one. Once you have that, you’re going to identify problems inside of that data and see where you need to focus. Then it’s the discussion of how am I going to solve that — is it a simple, human-driven process change? Or do I want to approach this from an AI standpoint and try to automate that workflow, or do something else on the tech side to help move it forward?

Why is there so much lift to get the data ready?

You're underestimating the complexity of the data itself. It's highly variable. There are different formats or inconsistent definitions that are happening amongst the different teams, perhaps. Without standardization, these integration efforts will stall, and it'll slow things down.

Second is the ownership piece. The data is sitting across multiple teams in logistics, finance and operations, and if there's no single group accountable for bringing it all together, it's going to lead to misalignment.

One other piece that can sometimes fail is that people will say the AI component is an IT initiative: “Let's just give it to the computer nerds inside the company and have them get this up and going.” In reality, it's an operational transformation right inside of your organization, and until there's clear ownership — you've standardized these definitions, and there's a direct tie to those business decisions — it's going to be tough to see it through.

What are the signs that it's working well?

What are the outcomes that you're looking for? Ultimately, that is where it should fall. You're saying, “I want to improve margins in this area,” or “I want to reduce inventory in this area.” That's your sign. Have you gotten to that point? Can you do it?

What are other stumbling blocks on the front end?

ID 369367720 © Nebasin | Dreamstime.com
revops_1
ID 13563444 © Nevodka | Dreamstime.com
dreamstime_xl_13563444
ID 126816637 © Katarinanh | Dreamstime.com
jess0305

Antiquated data. Can you gain access to it? What format is it in? How many different places is it sitting in? A bunch of companies obviously are already in the cloud, and it's a lot easier for us to gain access to that data. But if you've got these old servers sitting on site, you’ve got one guy inside the organization that knows how it works really well, but nobody else really has an idea of how to do anything in it. Things like that can certainly be a barrier, but it's not something you can't overcome with a little bit of time and effort.

What other signs of trouble should leaders look out for?

Adopting the tools and ensuring everybody is using them is super important because AI is collecting that data, right? One of those inputs is the adoption of the tool itself, whatever you're using. If it's not fully embraced, the results and what it's kicking out could be altered and not something you could necessarily rely on and feel comfortable with.

How do you troubleshoot these things?

The best thing to do is hit the brakes. Stop for a second, go back and reassess where everything's at. It's more of an operational push a lot of the time than just on the tech side. That’s where we are really good at combining all the data and getting everything flowing, but at the end of the day, bad data in means a bad result at the other end.

What best practices do you recommend to clients to improve their data readiness?

Having good data quality standards, rather than just letting people drop files wherever they want to. You've got some type of standardization inside the organization, where, if you have a data warehouse, you've got somebody that's maintaining it. You've got a standard that's set so they know where things are supposed to be and when they're supposed to be updated, and it's reviewed regularly to clean it up. This is something that AI can also help with. Agents are starting to be able to do stuff like that for people automatically, too.

If you don't have a data warehouse yet — if you're maybe still living in spreadsheets and folders on your computer, spread around the organization — that's step one. Look into building out that data warehouse and using that data to help you make decisions down the road, not just within an individual team. Bring that all into one spot so they can look at it across the entire organization and actually start making some decisions.

This interview has been edited for clarity and readability.

Mike Mullen, COO of Bear Cognition

Mike is a Senior Executive and Technical Advisor with 20+ years of experience in the transportation industry. Mike is currently the President & COO for Bear Cognition.

Prior to Bear Cognition, Mike was Chief Operating Officer for the largest independent affiliate of Worldwide Express Global Logistics, the world's #5 Freight Broker and #41 Logistics firm. He is responsible for operations that encompass over 5,000 clients in 11 states and has been instrumental in the introduction of freight, analytics, and consulting. 

About the Author

Andrea Zelinski

Andrea Zelinski

Contributor

Andrea Zelinski is an award-winning freelance journalist with a passion for translating complex issues, trends and strategies into clear, engaging content to help people improve their businesses and their lives. 

She spent 15 years as a political reporter covering state governments in Illinois, Tennessee and Texas, reporting from the halls of state capitols for publications including Texas Monthly, the Houston Chronicle and the San Antonio Express-News. In 2021, she shifted her focus to business journalism, joining Travel Weekly as senior cruise editor, where she covered the travel industry’s recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. 

When not reporting, Andrea is probably hiking. Known for embracing ambitious challenges, she hiked the entire Appalachian Trail in 2020 and the Pacific Crest Trail in 2025. 

Quiz

mktg-icon Your Competitive Edge, Delivered

Make smart decisions faster with ExecutiveEDGE’s weekly newsletter. It delivers leadership insights, economic trends, and forward-thinking strategies. Gain perspectives from today’s top business minds and stay informed on innovations shaping tomorrow’s business landscape.

marketing-image